In case of errors discovered by someone other than the evaluated Airman, what is advised?

In situations where errors are identified by individuals who are not the evaluated Airman, utilizing the BLSDM (Bureau of Logistics Support Data Management) or CMS (Corrective Action Management System) process is advised. This approach ensures that issues are logged properly and can be addressed through the designated channels as per organizational protocols. These systems are designed to manage and rectify errors effectively while maintaining accountability and transparency in the evaluation process.

By using BLSDM or CMS, the identified issues can be documented, investigated, and resolved in a structured manner, allowing for corrective action to be taken. This is critical not only for the improvement of the Airman being evaluated but also for the integrity of the overall evaluation system, ensuring that ongoing training and assessments reflect the highest standards of safety and proficiency within aviation.

Other options may lead to a lack of proper reporting or accountability. For instance, ignoring the error is unacceptable as it can compromise safety and performance. Reporting directly to the evaluator without using the formal systems may bypass necessary protocols and documentation. Filing a complaint in writing might be appropriate in some contexts, but it may not provide the systematic corrective action that BLSDM or CMS ensures.