Which document must accompany appeals for corrections in evaluations?

The requirement for supporting evidence of the error when appealing for corrections in evaluations is crucial because it establishes the basis for the appeal. When an individual believes there has been an error in their evaluation, simply stating that there is an error is not sufficient. Supporting evidence serves to substantiate the claim being made, providing concrete documentation or information that evidences the inaccuracies in the original evaluation.

This could involve presenting data, examples of performance, or any relevant documentation that highlights where the initial evaluation faltered. The inclusion of this evidence helps reviewers assess the validity of the appeal and make informed decisions regarding any necessary corrections to the evaluation. It ensures that the appeals process is grounded in factual information, which can lead to a fair and impartial assessment of the validity of the concerns raised.

Other documents like the initial evaluation, previous performance reviews, or new performance evaluations may provide context or background, but they are not sufficient on their own to support an appeal. Without concrete evidence demonstrating the specific errors in the evaluation being contested, the appeal may lack the necessary foundation to be considered seriously.