Which of the following actions is prohibited by the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board?

The action that is prohibited by the Evaluation Reports Appeal Board is re-accomplishing an evaluation without new evaluation provided. This is because the integrity of the evaluation process necessitates that each assessment be based on the most current and relevant information available. Simply redoing an evaluation without incorporating new data undermines the validity of the evaluation and could lead to misrepresentations of an individual's performance or standing.

In professional evaluation contexts, it is crucial that evaluations reflect an accurate and fair assessment, which can only be achieved by using fresh evidence or circumstances that warrant a reassessment. Without this information, the re-evaluation does not contribute meaningfully to the individual's record and could introduce bias or inaccuracies.

The other options revolve around administrative changes that could potentially be made within the evaluation process, such as amending evaluations, changing authors, or altering supporting documents, provided they adhere to the rules and protocols established by the governing body overseeing the evaluations. These actions allow for correction or clarification within the framework but do not fundamentally disrupt the integrity of the original assessment as long as they are conducted within the established guidelines.